Re: OT not acceptable use or just more attempts at censorship?
- From: Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:52:27 +0000
Doug wrote:
On 19 Jan, 16:23, Conor <conor_tur...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:In article <lYidnRH2q4GBOunUnZ2dnUVZ8q_in...@xxxxxx>, Brimstone says...You obviously don't know me very well. I am far from reliant on BT and
Jolly good, take it as a warning. The clue to keeping your BT service is inDoes this mean he can be reported for trolling as well? 'kin ell, he's
the NG title.
gonna be offline a lot and sending a lot of grovelling faxes to BT.
have several other options. So watch out you don't go off-topic or
troll.
BTW what about uk.transport rules? Strange I can find no mention of OT
posting in the charter. Seems our friend Eeyore/Graham at
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx is in error. Any bets he is a
cop?
--
Carfree Cities
http://www.carfree.com/
Promoting practical alternatives to car dependence - walking, cycling
and public transport.
Why do you think he is a cop?
--
Tony the Dragon
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: OT not acceptable use or just more attempts at censorship?
- Next by Date: Re: Labour opens up hard shoulders to save £5bn on new lanes
- Previous by thread: Re: OT not acceptable use or just more attempts at censorship?
- Next by thread: Re: OT not acceptable use or just more attempts at censorship?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
