Re: Another crash motorist let off lightly.

"Adrian" <toomany2cvs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:6n11vqFjajeaU2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Brimstone" <brimstone520-ng03@xxxxxxxxxxx> gurgled happily, sounding much
like they were saying:

In other words, impose rules and forms of behaviour on other people
without their consent. In what way is that different to the present
system?

The idiots who want "anarchy" know damn well they've got no chance of
getting elected under a democratic system, because they're from the loony
fringes, so think it's the only way that they can seize the reins of
power...

Mind you, I'm intrigued by...
So, anarchists could co-operate among themselves to, say, deter killer
motorists. They could, for example, if permitted by government

So these anarchists need permission from government?

Doug ties himself in knots trying to hold a debate/argument. Well, nothing new there. Basically, he is utterly ignorant of what anarchy really is. [Actually, that sentence would make just as much sense truncated to "he is utterly ignorant."] His interpretation of the term really means "what I want, and sod everyone else."

Though it's worth saving a few of his snippets from this thread and using them against him later.

.