Re: Climate activists occupy proposed site for coal-fired power station.
- From: Abo <no@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:25:42 +0100
Mike P wrote:
Abo wrote:Doug wrote:No apologies for posting this to a transport newsgroup dominated byHmm I agree they shouldn't be building another coal-fired power
polluting motorists who are in denial over anthropogenic global
warming and climate change. Now watch them try to rubbish the CC
activists.
station. It should be nuclear.
There is a lot of coal, and they might as well use it for something useful, as it's about the only thing it can be used for. However, I agree with ou - Nuclear would be a better option long term.
Indeed; I can't see the sense in spending billions now on a coal plant only to spend billions more later on a nuke. They might as well just build the nukes now and not waste the cash on coal.
--
Abo
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Seat-belt warning after baby on mother's lap is catapulted 150ft through car windscreen at 80mph.
- Next by Date: Re: Climate activists occupy proposed site for coal-fired power station.
- Previous by thread: Re: Climate activists occupy proposed site for coal-fired power station.
- Next by thread: Re: Climate activists occupy proposed site for coal-fired power station.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|