Re: Suburbs aren't so respectable after all
- From: nik.morgan <nik.morgan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:29:17 +0100
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:19:18 +0100, Doug wrote
(in article
<54dba5a9-e84e-4ab8-83ad-e1cbd0ecb672@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>):
Errrm, Catford is a suburb. And I agree with you about what a shithole
it is.
Wrong again. Catford has a proper town centre, a village green, mixed
use zoning, grid topology, and good public transport. So not a suburb
in the modern sense of the word. Not like those ghastly places outside
the M25 consisting of homogeneous detached housing subdivisions/ cul
de sacs / megamalls / business parks. Besides, Catford has been a part
of London proper for ages. It's no more a suburb than Kensington.
How do you know, you don't live there.
NM
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
.
- References:
- Suburbs aren't so respectable after all
- From: Doug
- Re: Suburbs aren't so respectable after all
- From: Steve Firth
- Re: Suburbs aren't so respectable after all
- From: Doug
- Suburbs aren't so respectable after all
- Prev by Date: Re: Suburbs aren't so respectable after all
- Next by Date: Re: Pensioners seized by Heathrow police - over 'inflammatory' protest T-shirts
- Previous by thread: Re: Suburbs aren't so respectable after all
- Next by thread: Re: Suburbs aren't so respectable after all
- Index(es):