Re: THIS IS MOHAMMED 18
- From: Doug <jagmad@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:17:05 -0800 (PST)
On 29 Nov, 10:28, %ste...@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Steve Firth) wrote:
Doug <jag...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Actually, it has probably got worse recently, since terrorists have
managed to persuade our government to further erode our civil
liberties and human rights.
Correct, terrorists are instrumental imn causing repression.
So why do you support terrorism?
When women misguidedly fought for a vote that wasn't worth having,
they used methods which undoubtedly would be labeled as 'terrorism'
today and they were imprisoned and subjected to humiliating treatment.
Had this happened today would you have condemned such 'terrorism' and
labelled them STs?
The government has already bowed in part to the demands of ARAs by
banning fur farming and they even made a tokenistic gesture against
hunting with dogs, which unfortunately is seldom enforced by police,
indeed the police seem to prefer to arrest anti-hunters instead. The
police are notorious for deliberately misusing and abusing laws, which
seem to have some valid original purpose, and anti-terrorism is one of
them.
--
UK Radical Campaigns
www.zing.icom43.net
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible
will make violent revolution inevitable".
John.F.Kennedy
.
- References:
- Re: THIS IS MOHAMMED 18
- From: Doug
- Re: THIS IS MOHAMMED 18
- From: NM
- Re: THIS IS MOHAMMED 18
- From: Doug
- Re: THIS IS MOHAMMED 18
- From: Fod
- Re: THIS IS MOHAMMED 18
- From: Doug
- Re: THIS IS MOHAMMED 18
- From: Steve Firth
- Re: THIS IS MOHAMMED 18
- Prev by Date: Re: THIS IS MOHAMMED 18
- Next by Date: Re: THIS IS MOHAMMED 18
- Previous by thread: Re: THIS IS MOHAMMED 18
- Next by thread: Re: THIS IS MOHAMMED 18
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|