Re: Norway says cars neither "green" nor "clean"

Brimstone wrote:
Brian Robertson wrote:
Adrian wrote:
Brian Robertson (Brian Robertson <brian@[nospam].com>) gurgled
happily, sounding much like they were saying:

Dangerous, by implication implies a possibility of death or injury.
<sigh>
I don't think anybody's ever said that driving is EVER not
"dangerous" by that standard - quite the opposite. It's all about
managing risk. As is cycling. Or getting out of bed in a morning.

My guess is that the German autobahns are built for those kind of
speeds.
Ever been to Germany?

British roads have never been built for speeds above 70 m.p.h.
Wrong.

Bear in mind as well (As I thought you knew by now) that I am a
cyclist. The idea of someone coming up behind me at a speed of even
70 m.p.h. is extremely intimidating.
You poor ickle bunny-wabbit.

I presume you wouldn't choose to cycle on that dual carriageway
bypass, then? After all, it's a 70 limit, with an almost certainty
of traffic travelling faster.

172 would probably sweep me off my bike before the driver had even
realised that I was there.
Perhaps. But in that situation, 172mph wouldn't be safe, would it?
Especially with a driver with such poor observation.

Nobody has ever said it's inherently safe. Of course it isn't. 20mph
isn't, in the wrong time and place. In the _right_ time and place,
though, 172mph may well be safe.

In terms of road risk, it looks as if it WAS on this occasion.
In terms of legal risk, I'd be hard pushed to suggest a situation on
UK roads when it was...
Go away and bug somebody who has more time for your drivel.

He did.



Ah, the man who thinks that I am being a cheapskate not owning a car when my wife has a company vehicle, I get free travel on the buses, staff buses sent out to me in out of service hours, live near a train station, own a push bike and hate driving.

Well your opinion is obviously always welcome.

Brian.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Norway says cars neither "green" nor "clean"
    ... Nobody has ever said it's inherently safe. ... In terms of road risk, it looks as if it WAS on this occasion. ... staff buses sent out to me in out of service hours, ...
    (uk.transport)
  • Re: Norway says cars neither "green" nor "clean"
    ... Nobody has ever said it's inherently safe. ... In terms of road risk, it looks as if it WAS on this occasion. ... Ah, the man who thinks that I am being a cheapskate not owning a car when my wife has a company vehicle, I get free travel on the buses, staff buses sent out to me in out of service hours, live near a train station, own a push bike and hate driving. ...
    (uk.transport)
  • Re: Everyone got their generator ready?
    ... "Yes, and since you cannot envisage what may happen, you should stick to procedures which are safe in all eventualities." ... *nothing* is safe in all eventualities and if you knew *anything* about risk and safety you would not say otherwise. ... You are right in that small generators would either shut down or burn out if subjected to the sort of overload that would occur if connected to the grid on power failure. ... I never suggested that "any Tom Dick or Harry could design such a control circuit, indeed such a circuit had not even been mentioned at that time. ...
    (uk.business.agriculture)
  • Re: File encryption software?
    ... a passPRHASE is a very secure but easy to remember technique. ... Many applications still have an anachronistic limit on password length but PW Safe ... the downside risk is great. ... lived for 50+ years without needing the gun that I carry. ...
    (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)
  • Re: Norway says cars neither "green" nor "clean"
    ... In terms of road risk, it looks as if it WAS on this occasion. ... Ah, the man who thinks that I am being a cheapskate not owning a car when my wife has a company vehicle, I get free travel on the buses, staff buses sent out to me in out of service hours, live near a train station, own a push bike and hate driving. ...
    (uk.transport)
Loading