Re: Railways
- From: "Brimstone" <brimstone@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:43:33 +0100
"Huge" <Huge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:f0kl39$3vu$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
But if trains had been subject to the
same development that cars have, we'd have driverless 200mph jobs
every 20 minutes. Not scruffy oiks blowing whistles and waving flags.
Railways have been develping at the same rate as road vehicles so
technically at least, there's no reason we can't have those things. If you
look to other countries they have 200mph trains (some even faster IIRC) with
all sorts of technical gadgets and gizmos.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Railways
- From: Steve Firth
- Re: Railways
- From: NM
- Re: Railways
- From: Adrian
- Re: Railways
- References:
- Re: Railways
- From: NM
- Re: Railways
- From: allan tracy
- Re: Railways
- From: Steve Firth
- Re: Railways
- From: Derek Geldard
- Re: Railways
- From: allan tracy
- Re: Railways
- From: Steve Firth
- Re: Railways
- From: allan tracy
- Re: Railways
- From: Brian Robertson
- Re: Railways
- From: Brimstone
- Re: Railways
- From: NM
- Re: Railways
- From: Brian
- Re: Railways
- From: NM
- Re: Railways
- From: Brian
- Re: Railways
- From: NM
- Re: Railways
- From: Brian
- Re: Railways
- From: Brian
- Re: Railways
- Prev by Date: Re: Yesterday's A66 crash
- Next by Date: Re: Blair and Schumacher in road plea
- Previous by thread: Re: Railways
- Next by thread: Re: Railways
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|