Re: Railways
- From: NM <never.opened@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:01:46 GMT
Brian wrote:
On 23 Apr, 17:15, NM <never.ope...@xxxxxxx> wrote:What did you have 200 years ago, Horses wasn't it? 100 is correct but that won't suit your point so lets ignore that shall we?Brian wrote:
Yup, I've been asking Northern Rail to replace "Rocket" on theYou are cheating, he said 100 years. that brings you into the heyday of
Manchester-Liverpool line for some time now - it is getting rather
long in the tooth, and sitting in the open air in third class is not
much fun ...
Gods Wonderful Railway, Star class 4-6-0's etc. and the early pacifics
on the east coast mainline.
I think Huge said 200 years, which would take us back to ... 1807.
He's quite right that nothing has changed in the technology since
then. 25kV overhead lines, 3 phase electric motors (don't even ask me
what they are), colour signalling and tilting trains are so 18th
century, yah?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Railways
- From: Brian
- Re: Railways
- From: Brimstone
- Re: Railways
- References:
- Railways
- From: Brian Robertson
- Re: Railways
- From: allan tracy
- Re: Railways
- From: NM
- Re: Railways
- From: allan tracy
- Re: Railways
- From: Steve Firth
- Re: Railways
- From: Derek Geldard
- Re: Railways
- From: allan tracy
- Re: Railways
- From: Steve Firth
- Re: Railways
- From: allan tracy
- Re: Railways
- From: Brian Robertson
- Re: Railways
- From: Brimstone
- Re: Railways
- From: NM
- Re: Railways
- From: Brian
- Re: Railways
- From: NM
- Re: Railways
- From: Brian
- Railways
- Prev by Date: Re: Railways
- Next by Date: Re: Railways
- Previous by thread: Re: Railways
- Next by thread: Re: Railways
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|