Re: Railways

NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
"NM" <never.opened@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:wE4Xh.9126$M_3.2650@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Brimstone wrote:
"NM" <never.opened@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:W43Xh.2271$V7.806@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Now they are a terminal basket case..
Why?
Market forces.

Wrong.

Care to try again?

No, because I was right the first time, your assertion isn't 'truth'.

And nor are market forces the right way to judge transport needs.

Brian.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Surrogate factoring, room for error?
    ... >>begins with a truth and proceeds by logical steps. ... >>All we need is your assertion that you have started with a truth ... > I actually care about what's true versus talking. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, room for error?
    ... >>begins with a truth and proceeds by logical steps. ... >>All we need is your assertion that you have started with a truth ... > I actually care about what's true versus talking. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Railways
    ... Care to try again? ... No, because I was right the first time, your assertion isn't 'truth'. ... I haven't made an assertion, apart from the fact that your statement is untrue. ...
    (uk.transport)
  • Re: Railways
    ... Market forces. ... Care to try again? ... No, because I was right the first time, your assertion isn't 'truth'. ...
    (uk.transport)
  • Re: Railways
    ... Care to try again? ... No, because I was right the first time, your assertion isn't 'truth'. ... I haven't made an assertion, apart from the fact that your statement is untrue. ...
    (uk.transport)
Loading