Re: From The Times today...



Brimstone wrote:

In news:44D65DF1.14DEC247@xxxxxxxxxxx,
John B said:
Squashme wrote:

Mark Goodge wrote:

I suspect that most of them are simply unconcerned about what the
solicitor is saying in their name. They have more important things
to worry about. Such as rebuilding their lives. I find it
disgusting that British Cycling seemingly can't leave them to do so.

Others may find your attitude disgusting.

He has one sick outlook.

BC are not involved because they want to be, which is what Goodge
sordidly implies, but because the families have requested their
professional expert assistance in their tragic loss of life.
Goodge's outpourings leave a very nasty taste.

It seems he would prefer that help and support from the national
cycling bodies is refused to those who have lost their loved ones.

Not nice at all.

Surely that depends on the nature of the help and support?

Of course it does.
BC will have put the families in touch with solicitors who are experts in
cases involving cyclists. It will be up to the families whether or not they
accept the advice and support offered.
If it is unwelcome it can be refused. At teh moment that doesn't seem to
have happened.

Goodge would seem to prefer that BC withdrew all support, even though the
families may not wish it.
He seems to know what they want.

John B

.

Relevant Pages