Re: Streets reclaimed from petrol-heads!
- From: "iiiiDougiiii" <doug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jul 2006 23:44:09 -0700
Fod wrote:
iiiiDougiiii wrote:Only if they are in control, which they may not be.
and you don't think the parent or legal guardians should accept anyIf a pedestrian walks out into the road without looking, and is hit byIt is the fault of the least vulnerable. I suppose if a baby crawled
something tavelling along the road, is it the fault of the pedestrian
or the thing travelling along the road?
into the road and was run over you would blame the baby.
blame in this scenario?
Then how do you account for the fact that sometimes society accepts
In our societythe vulnerable in society have guardians who hold responsiblity for
the vulnerable have to be trained to accept liability, to ensure the
maximum freedom of the least vulnerable. It is merely the law of the
jungle slightly disguised by a thin veil of civilisation.
their well being. Kids don't raise themselves after all...
responsibility for kids?
Kids no longer have anywhere to run around free from the danger of the
Are you suggesting its ok for someone to go away on holiday and leave
young children to fend for themselves as thats in line with you
suggesting its ok for very young kids with no road sense to be running
around.
mass car cult.
Surely it is the person in charge of the dangerous machine who should
Both the driver and the person hit can have responsiblity for a road
accident. Sometimes it could be entirely one persons fault. Generally
the driver will have the greater responsiblity as they are in control
of the vehicles and are licensed to use it safetly.
be made to accept responsibility.
It is not an 'accident' it is a crash. The word 'accident' is used as a
Personally I think pedestrians acting in a dangerous or careless
fashion must accept some blame if they cause an accient. I'm not
trying to avoid blaming the driver when its appropriate to do so but
i'm not going to pretend that its always the driver that is the cause.
convenient euphemism for a road kill and to divert blame from the
powerful perpetrator to the vulnerable victim.
You should drive at a suitable speed for the conditions anyway. If you
I've had kids run out in front of me because they've been playing and
not paying attention despite being on or beside a road. Whilst i've
observed them and reduced my speed and been able to stop in time, thus
preventing an accident, I don't feel that i'm to blame for my emergancy
stop and don't think I'm the person behaving dangerously in that
scenario.
are able to observe children on the pavement, despite a line of parked
cars, then you should slow down.
--
UK Radical Campaigns
www.zing.icom43.net
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Ben Franklin
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Streets reclaimed from petrol-heads!
- From: stevesmith
- Re: Streets reclaimed from petrol-heads!
- From: Clive Coleman.
- Re: Streets reclaimed from petrol-heads!
- From: Fod
- Re: Streets reclaimed from petrol-heads!
- References:
- Re: Streets reclaimed from petrol-heads!
- From: Clive Coleman.
- Re: Streets reclaimed from petrol-heads!
- From: iiiiDougiiii
- Re: Streets reclaimed from petrol-heads!
- From: Adrian
- Re: Streets reclaimed from petrol-heads!
- From: iiiiDougiiii
- Re: Streets reclaimed from petrol-heads!
- From: Adrian
- Re: Streets reclaimed from petrol-heads!
- From: iiiiDougiiii
- Re: Streets reclaimed from petrol-heads!
- From: Adrian
- Re: Streets reclaimed from petrol-heads!
- From: iiiiDougiiii
- Re: Streets reclaimed from petrol-heads!
- From: iiiiDougiiii
- Re: Streets reclaimed from petrol-heads!
- From: Fod
- Re: Streets reclaimed from petrol-heads!
- Prev by Date: Re: Streets reclaimed from petrol-heads!
- Next by Date: Re: Streets reclaimed from petrol-heads!
- Previous by thread: Re: Streets reclaimed from petrol-heads!
- Next by thread: Re: Streets reclaimed from petrol-heads!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|