Re: Europeans urged to act on climate




iiiiDougiiii wrote:
Fod wrote:
I seem to recall that some ARAs did do that and hurt
some innocent children.
UK source?
given in the past. several times. search the newsgroup as thats what
you tell people to do when you quote things you've referenced
before....

So you have no source to support your specious claim. Typical!
http://www.rds-online.org.uk/pages/page.asp?i_PageID=1799&i_ToolbarID=5
They placed a bomb under a car which later fell of and hurt a child.
Oh so now it is not 'childen', as you previously claimed, but just one
child and the extent of the alleged injuries is unknown.
Goal post moving a speciality, you should contact Wembly they could
use your services from what i hear.

YOu asked for a link and I provided one. I could provide others but
you hands over the ears attitude means you'd simply stop replying...
YOu moan that i have no sources. Then you moan, no that the source
doesn't prove violence, but that its not violent enough?





You have no sources to support your demonisation of ARAs.
try the following in addtion to the above. It really show the best of
ARA tactics and how they are winning the argument peacefully...

http://www.vare.org.uk/

Who said anything about 'peacefully'? Peacefully doesn't work, as
history shows.
So you do support violent acts. Thak you for finally stating it for
the record. That link shows why its not demonisation of the ARAs.

Fod


"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
You've given up your right to vote... Are you saying you don't deserve
safety or liberty Doug?

You don't understand the quote do you.
I understand it Doug. I also understand that you refusing to use all
means available to you is hurting you rather than helping you. If you
were strong in your views you would do more but you have no real desire
for change, no willingness to try new things and no ideas to back up
your discontent.

It is very apposite when applied
to the new anti-terrorism laws. The risk from terrorism is quite small
compared to many other daily risks and yet our government is prepared
to sacrifice our civil liberties and human rights in its high profile
war on terrorism.
Who said anytthing about terrorism? This is about your giving up
rights.



Fod

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Europeans urged to act on climate
    ... temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." ... You don't understand the quote do you. ... The risk from terrorism is quite small ...
    (uk.transport)
  • Re: Seeking source for quote
    ... "They that would sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a temporary ... deserve neither liberty nor safety." ... Franklin didn't write that quote. ...
    (soc.history.war.world-war-ii)
  • Re: Papers and blood, comrade.
    ... All they have to do is raise the bogey word, "terrorism," and sound ... deserves neither liberty nor safety. ... "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to ...
    (rec.autos.driving)
  • Re: AM I Retarded?
    ... >> deserve neither liberty nor safety. ... > Thank you for reminding me about that quote, ... Who disturbs this class as a pebble disturbs a pond? ...
    (microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse)
  • Re: AM I Retarded?
    ... >> deserve neither liberty nor safety. ... > Thank you for reminding me about that quote, ... Laura ...
    (microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse)