Re: Carbon neutral
- From: Steve Firth <%steve%@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 12:47:17 +0100
On 17 May 2006 03:14:49 -0700, iiiiDougiiii wrote:
Steve Firth wrote:
On 17 May 2006 00:15:38 -0700, iiiiDougiiii wrote:
Yes but it all boils down to timescales doesn't it.
Something you have trouble understanding.
Still waiting for your explanation,
Of what?
which you seem unable to give. No surprise there then.
It's like a bloody broken record. Do you imagine that repeating over and
over again this specious claim makes it true or does anything other than
make you look like a shifty dishonest fool?
Like your running away from your stupidity over the presence of the remains
of subtropical species in central London.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Carbon neutral
- From: iiiiDougiiii
- Re: Carbon neutral
- References:
- Carbon neutral
- From: gazzafield
- Re: Carbon neutral
- From: iiiiDougiiii
- Re: Carbon neutral
- From: Steve Firth
- Re: Carbon neutral
- From: iiiiDougiiii
- Re: Carbon neutral
- From: Steve Firth
- Re: Carbon neutral
- From: iiiiDougiiii
- Re: Carbon neutral
- From: Adrian
- Re: Carbon neutral
- From: iiiiDougiiii
- Re: Carbon neutral
- From: Adrian
- Re: Carbon neutral
- From: iiiiDougiiii
- Re: Carbon neutral
- From: Steve Firth
- Re: Carbon neutral
- From: iiiiDougiiii
- Carbon neutral
- Prev by Date: Re: Hi Doug
- Next by Date: Re: Carbon neutral
- Previous by thread: Re: Carbon neutral
- Next by thread: Re: Carbon neutral
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|