Re: More anti-roadbuilding protests.
- From: Conor <conor.turton@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:33:02 -0000
In article <1132552685.400800.308210@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
iiiiDougiiii says...
> So? A similar distance by car would have taken a small fraction of the
> time, which in turn allows much longer journeys.
>
Rubbish.
--
Conor
"You're not married, you haven't got a girlfriend and you've never seen
Star Trek? Good Lord!" - Patrick Stewart, Extras.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: More anti-roadbuilding protests.
- From: iiiiDougiiii
- Re: More anti-roadbuilding protests.
- References:
- Re: More anti-roadbuilding protests.
- From: iiiiDougiiii
- Re: More anti-roadbuilding protests.
- From: Ian
- Re: More anti-roadbuilding protests.
- From: iiiiDougiiii
- Re: More anti-roadbuilding protests.
- From: Conor
- Re: More anti-roadbuilding protests.
- From: iiiiDougiiii
- Re: More anti-roadbuilding protests.
- From: Fod
- Re: More anti-roadbuilding protests.
- From: iiiiDougiiii
- Re: More anti-roadbuilding protests.
- From: Conor
- Re: More anti-roadbuilding protests.
- From: iiiiDougiiii
- Re: More anti-roadbuilding protests.
- From: Phil Bradshaw
- Re: More anti-roadbuilding protests.
- From: Conor
- Re: More anti-roadbuilding protests.
- From: iiiiDougiiii
- Re: More anti-roadbuilding protests.
- From: Conor
- Re: More anti-roadbuilding protests.
- From: iiiiDougiiii
- Re: More anti-roadbuilding protests.
- From: Conor
- Re: More anti-roadbuilding protests.
- From: iiiiDougiiii
- Re: More anti-roadbuilding protests.
- Prev by Date: Re: More anti-roadbuilding protests.
- Next by Date: Re: Slinging Mud at SUVs.
- Previous by thread: Re: More anti-roadbuilding protests.
- Next by thread: Re: More anti-roadbuilding protests.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|