Re: Oyster Card
- From: Michael Hoffman <cam.ac.uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:23:19 +0100
John B wrote:
On 24 Aug, 11:31, Michael Hoffman <cam.ac...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:The poor design element is that you can't validate on a bus, therebyI think we have different definitions of "trivial."
making validation actually an issue instead of the non-issue it ought
to be (yes, I know the excuses for this; however, it'd be trivially
easy to make bus-based readers connect to the base by GPRS every five
minutes to exchange relevant data with the central system).
TfL has a secure private network in place to link the fixed Oyster
readers to their central server. Companies have been able for many
years to provide their employees and their employees' devices with VPN
access over GPRS to their secure private networks. Integrating mobile
devices with electronic peripherals is more or less a matter of plug-
and-play.
I'm missing the 'non-trivial' element, here...
Yes, you are.
Even writing a specification for such a system detailed enough to be implemented would not be trivial. I'd say that anything that involves the deployment of new hardware and software across thousands of buses will not be trivial. Almost-real-time wireless communication only adds to the complexity.
--
Michael Hoffman
.
- References:
- Re: Oyster Card
- From: Michael Hoffman
- Re: Oyster Card
- From: Olof Lagerkvist
- Re: Oyster Card
- From: Michael Hoffman
- Re: Oyster Card
- From: Barry Salter
- Re: Oyster Card
- From: Uncle Dave
- Re: Oyster Card
- From: Mr Thant
- Re: Oyster Card
- From: Uncle Dave
- Re: Oyster Card
- From: Uncle Dave
- Re: Oyster Card
- From: Ian Jelf
- Re: Oyster Card
- From: Uncle Dave
- Re: Oyster Card
- From: asdf
- Re: Oyster Card
- From: John B
- Re: Oyster Card
- From: Michael Hoffman
- Re: Oyster Card
- From: John B
- Re: Oyster Card
- Prev by Date: Re: Oyster Card
- Next by Date: Re: Oyster Card
- Previous by thread: Re: Oyster Card
- Next by thread: Re: Oyster Card
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|