Re: New Fares
- From: "tim \(moved to sweden\)" <tim_in_sweden2005@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 12:25:36 +0200
"Phil Richards" <philrichards1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:liba4lzcj90a.cl4vama0a526.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> John Rowland wrote:
>
>> There is no need to make the whole of London prepaid only, just the
>> well-used stops. There would be no confusion for passengers, because the
>> bus
>> stops that had machines would be prepaid-only, and those that didn't
>> wouldn't.
>
> But surely isn't the plan to make all buses cash free? In which case I'm
> sure there will be stops without machines plus of course lengthy sections
> of hail & ride services. In those cases I can see that passengers will
> have
> to have a valid ticket, pass or prepay in hand before boarding.
I realise that the legal systems might be different however
I think the principle of avoiding payment is the same, but
Hannover lost a legal case doing just this.
They tried to prosecute some people for riding without
a ticket from a stop with no machine They lost on the
basis that as the pax hadn't been given the opportunity
to buy a ticket so it was unreasonable to expect then to
have done so.
And this is in a town where it is possible to buy advanced
undated single tickets for all rides which isn't currently an
option in London.
tim
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New Fares
- From: Phil Richards
- Re: New Fares
- From: Neil Williams
- Re: New Fares
- References:
- Re: New Fares
- From: Neil Williams
- Re: New Fares
- From: Richard Adamfi
- Re: New Fares
- From: Neil Williams
- Re: New Fares
- From: Richard Adamfi
- Re: New Fares
- From: Neil Williams
- Re: New Fares
- From: Phil Richards
- Re: New Fares
- From: Phil Richards
- Re: New Fares
- From: John Rowland
- Re: New Fares
- From: Phil Richards
- Re: New Fares
- Prev by Date: Re: Alcohol
- Next by Date: Re: New Fares
- Previous by thread: Re: New Fares
- Next by thread: Re: New Fares
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|