Re: Warwick Gardens at night
- From: Mike Bristow <mike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 18:52:11 +0000 (UTC)
In article <Pine.LNX.4.62.0508031716410.730@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Tom Anderson <twic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> No, that's irrelevant - HC rule 105 sayeth that "the safe rule is never to
> get closer than the overall stopping distance"; that applies to cars that
> are cruising at constant speed, in which case my calculations are correct.
> The stuff about average speed during braking is captured in the
> calculation of that overall stopping distance.
If we're to play with real-world numbers, throwing the HC out the
window would be the best bet. I think that a gap of 2 seconds
between vehicleS is reasonable (ie, 30 cars per minute per lane).
--
Mike Bristow - really a very good driver
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Warwick Gardens at night
- From: Richard J.
- Re: Warwick Gardens at night
- References:
- Warwick Gardens at night
- From: Paul Weaver
- Re: Warwick Gardens at night
- From: Peter Frimberly
- Re: Warwick Gardens at night
- From: Paul Weaver
- Re: Warwick Gardens at night
- From: Rupert Candy
- Re: Warwick Gardens at night
- From: Earl Purple
- Re: Warwick Gardens at night
- From: Rupert Candy
- Re: Warwick Gardens at night
- From: Richard J.
- Re: Warwick Gardens at night
- From: Earl Purple
- Re: Warwick Gardens at night
- From: Dave Arquati
- Re: Warwick Gardens at night
- From: Tom Anderson
- Re: Warwick Gardens at night
- From: Tony Bryer
- Re: Warwick Gardens at night
- From: Tom Anderson
- Warwick Gardens at night
- Prev by Date: Re: Is Clapham 'London'?
- Next by Date: Re: Is Clapham 'London'?
- Previous by thread: Re: Warwick Gardens at night
- Next by thread: Re: Warwick Gardens at night
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|