Re: 1899 / 18866 / 18185 et. al. - Reduced maximum call length?
- From: "News Reader" <no@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 19:17:45 +0100
"Roger Mills" <watt.tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5a12ufF2mpq3nU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In an earlier contribution to this discussion,
News Reader <no@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
I know we have untimed calls for ~5p per call to UK landlines.
However, these were traditionally disconnected after ~3 hours.
Just wondering if anyone can confirm that they now get disconnected
around the ~1 hour mark (55 minutes). This now seems to be the case.
Confirmations, thoughts, etc. welcomed :) .
Best wishes,
News Reader
No idea - most of my calls last no more than 5 minutes. Anyone who can
spend more than an hour on a single call must have time on their hands!
--
Cheers,
Roger
______
Email address maintained for newsgroup use only, and not regularly
monitored.. Messages sent to it may not be read for several weeks.
PLEASE REPLY TO NEWSGROUP!
Hi,
In addition to the other(s) nice replies and suggestions which I think are
equally right and valid - one / I could add or is / might be chaining their
calls.
Best wishes,
News Reader
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 1899 / 18866 / 18185 et. al. - Reduced maximum call length?
- From: Victor Delta
- Re: 1899 / 18866 / 18185 et. al. - Reduced maximum call length?
- References:
- 1899 / 18866 / 18185 et. al. - Reduced maximum call length?
- From: News Reader
- Re: 1899 / 18866 / 18185 et. al. - Reduced maximum call length?
- From: Roger Mills
- 1899 / 18866 / 18185 et. al. - Reduced maximum call length?
- Prev by Date: Re: 1899 / 18866 / 18185 et. al. - Reduced maximum call length?
- Next by Date: Virgin Media screw up my phone port
- Previous by thread: Re: 1899 / 18866 / 18185 et. al. - Reduced maximum call length?
- Next by thread: Re: 1899 / 18866 / 18185 et. al. - Reduced maximum call length?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading