Re: IS BT deliberately setting high noise margins to reduce exchange stress?
- From: Mike Tomlinson <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 13:05:35 +0000
In article <atcfzvasbuvgflfgrzfygqhx.ksrf030.pminews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
..ltd.uk>, Rodney Pont <aspaminy7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
Mine has varied between 7.5 and 10.5 over the last 24 hours but I have
a constant sync of 8128.
Can I check whether I have this right? A higher margin is desirable
because it ensures data quality at the expense of sync speed, yes/no?
It doesn't matter whether I set the margin to 1dB or 10dB, I always get
a sync of 8032kbps. So I just set the margin slider at 100%, which gets
me a pretty constant reported margin of 10-11dB.
Netgear DG834GT with DGTeam firmware.
--
(\__/)
(='.'=) Bunny says Windows 7 is Vi$ta reloaded.
(")_(") http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/windows_7.png
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- IS BT deliberately setting high noise margins to reduce exchange stress?
- From: The Natural Philosopher
- Re: IS BT deliberately setting high noise margins to reduce exchange stress?
- From: Rodney Pont
- IS BT deliberately setting high noise margins to reduce exchange stress?
- Prev by Date: Re: Sky Broadband: Phorm or some other snooping, or a coincidence?
- Next by Date: Re: IS BT deliberately setting high noise margins to reduce exchange stress?
- Previous by thread: Re: IS BT deliberately setting high noise margins to reduce exchange stress?
- Next by thread: Re: IS BT deliberately setting high noise margins to reduce exchange stress?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
