Re: Is it worth changing to ADSL Max
- From: Mark <i@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:33:04 +0100
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:48:00 +0100, "Michael Chare"
<MunderscoreNEWS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Mark Carver" <mark.carver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:67p791F2p3p62U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
And to think that in 2001/2002 BT refused to provide any ADSL service,
saying my line was far too long for even 512k to work :-)
I had to wait 2 1/2 years because of BT's obduracy. My theory is that they
thought that they could keep their costs down by not bothering with the
problems of long (high loss) lines.
Me too. I was first told my line was incapable of supporting ADSL.
Now I get 2.5Mb on ADSL Max.
--
(\__/) M.
(='.'=) Owing to the amount of spam posted via googlegroups
(")_(") I am blocking most articles posted from there.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is it worth changing to ADSL Max
- From: The Natural Philosopher
- Re: Is it worth changing to ADSL Max
- References:
- Is it worth changing to ADSL Max
- From: BJH
- Re: Is it worth changing to ADSL Max
- From: John
- Re: Is it worth changing to ADSL Max
- From: Michael Chare
- Re: Is it worth changing to ADSL Max
- From: Mark Carver
- Re: Is it worth changing to ADSL Max
- From: Michael Chare
- Is it worth changing to ADSL Max
- Prev by Date: Re: Mobile Broadband / 3G Broadband
- Next by Date: Re: Best ISP for Static IP address and high usage?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is it worth changing to ADSL Max
- Next by thread: Re: Is it worth changing to ADSL Max
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|