Re: Virgin Media's legal team are wrong
- From: "Ivor Jones" <ivor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 19:53:04 +0100
"Paul Cupis" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:f27cgm$2in2$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ivor Jones wrote:
That's a definition I can live with. A very good one,
actually.
Will you be adding it to your dictionary?
I don't have one. Although you seem to think I do. *Read* the definition
and you will see why I agree with it and don't agree with you.
Ivor
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Virgin Media's legal team are wrong
- From: Paul Cupis
- Re: Virgin Media's legal team are wrong
- References:
- Re: Virgin Media's legal team are wrong
- From: Dead Paul
- Re: Virgin Media's legal team are wrong
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Virgin Media's legal team are wrong
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Virgin Media's legal team are wrong
- From: Mark McIntyre
- Re: Virgin Media's legal team are wrong
- From: Alex Heney
- Re: Virgin Media's legal team are wrong
- From: Paul Cupis
- Re: Virgin Media's legal team are wrong
- From: Alex Heney
- Re: Virgin Media's legal team are wrong
- From: Dave N
- Re: Virgin Media's legal team are wrong
- From: Ivor Jones
- Re: Virgin Media's legal team are wrong
- From: Paul Cupis
- Re: Virgin Media's legal team are wrong
- Prev by Date: Re: Re: Which?
- Next by Date: Re: Re: WLZ
- Previous by thread: Re: Virgin Media's legal team are wrong
- Next by thread: Re: Virgin Media's legal team are wrong
- Index(es):