Re: Ping Peter Crosland
- From: "Kraftee" <kraftee@b&e-cottee.me.uk>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:38:29 +0100
Peter Crosland wrote:
Old Codger wrote:
George Weston wrote:
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:463508AF.76FCEA9F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Old Codger wrote:
Eeyore wrote:Non-linearity in the circuit of course ! That should have been
Old Codger wrote:you responded "bullshit".
Eeyore wrote:If there's non-linearity there may be an effect. Not otherwise.
Old Codger wrote:Playing silly buggers again? You question was about circuits
Eeyore wrote:It's not bullshit. It's 100% correct. Voice frequencies do
Old Codger wrote:Bullshit.
You asked a question, I answered. You say you are anIt won't if its linear.
expert. If you
are you will know that a circuit that operates at voice
frequencies can
have an effect at radio frequencies and you will know why.
not 'interfere' with RF
frequencies.
and my response was correct.
As I said above, to >which
Are you discussing frequencies or circuits now? It really is
difficult to keep up with your changing topics.
obvious to anyone with an ounce
of electronics experience.
The statement you quote above was in relation to circuits, toYou seriously think linear circuits create interference between
which I correctly responded with "bullshit".
say 2 frequencies of say 4 kHz
and 30kHz ?
Graham
And a late contender in the celebrity death match enters the ring!
It's now a three-way contest: Peter vs Eeyore vs Old Codger!
Who will win?
Will anyone?
Will they all fall on the ropes simultaneously?
It is probable that Eeyore will claim the prize since I will drop
out (don't play with trolls) and Peter has not posted recently.
However I know, and I suspect Peter does also, that he is just
trying to appear cleverer than anyone else. Probably needs to
boost his ego. Eeyore does appear to have some electronics
knowledge but the fact
that he misinterprets, misquotes and posts fatuous comments in
response to fairly obvious statements suggests to me that he is
trying to appear more knowledgeable than he really is. Pity really
because he just loses credibility.
It is really a case of seeing how far we can wind him up before he
resorts to abusive language along with seeing just how big a hole
he can excavate for himself. Since there appear to be at least two
persona posting under the name reinforces Old Codger's theory of
him being a JANN or Just Another Newnet Nutter.
Peter Crosland
I've just had a very bad idea..........It's not old Jimmy Windsoar is
it, come to regale us with all his superior (lack of) knowledge once
again. I had heard he was 'back in town' & putting the two
together...well you never can tell...
.
- References:
- Ping Peter Crosland
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Ping Peter Crosland
- From: Clark
- Re: Ping Peter Crosland
- From: Peter Crosland
- Re: Ping Peter Crosland
- From: Kraftee
- Re: Ping Peter Crosland
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Ping Peter Crosland
- From: Old Codger
- Re: Ping Peter Crosland
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Ping Peter Crosland
- From: Old Codger
- Re: Ping Peter Crosland
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Ping Peter Crosland
- From: Old Codger
- Re: Ping Peter Crosland
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Ping Peter Crosland
- From: Old Codger
- Re: Ping Peter Crosland
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Ping Peter Crosland
- From: Old Codger
- Re: Ping Peter Crosland
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Ping Peter Crosland
- From: George Weston
- Re: Ping Peter Crosland
- From: Old Codger
- Re: Ping Peter Crosland
- From: Peter Crosland
- Ping Peter Crosland
- Prev by Date: Re: Ping Peter Crosland
- Next by Date: Re: Broadband problems
- Previous by thread: Re: Ping Peter Crosland
- Next by thread: Re: Ping Peter Crosland
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|