Re: Spam retribution
- From: Joe Soap <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Dec 2005 17:43:42 GMT
In response to what Bob Eager <rde42@xxxxxxxxxxx> posted in
news:176uZD2KcidF-pn2-h0H7Rdelplfi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>> I have selected some that are obviously not spoofed, there is no point
>> asking me to respond to non-genuine addies. Hundreds of others I can do
>> nothing about.
>
> 'obviously not spoofed' - by what criteria?
By the criteria that I applied, of course. What's it matter to you?
--
Joe Soap.
JUNK is stuff that you keep for 20 years,
then throw away a week before you need it.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Spam retribution
- From: Bob Eager
- Re: Spam retribution
- From: Ian Stirling
- Re: Spam retribution
- References:
- Spam retribution
- From: Joe Soap
- Re: Spam retribution
- From: Tony Raven
- Re: Spam retribution
- From: Joe Soap
- Re: Spam retribution
- From: Bob Eager
- Spam retribution
- Prev by Date: Re: Escape from Tiscali
- Next by Date: Re: Spam retribution
- Previous by thread: Re: Spam retribution
- Next by thread: Re: Spam retribution
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|