Re: The usual modem vs. router argument.
- From: Peter M <us-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 01:19:20 +0000
On 15 Dec 2005 00:55, Alex Heney <me8@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>None of the PCs I have bought in the last five years (that is three
>each laptops and desktops) have come without an ethernet port,
>although on one of the laptops it was a combined modem/ethernet
>socket, which was a pain at times.
It really depends on what you've been looking at - in particular the
office / business category PCs will usually have more RAM and might
also have included a network card. I have certainly had to install
ethernet cards for people, where PCs came with (yuk!) 56k modems but
fortunately some of the order pages have allowed a customer to 'add'
a network card, and 'remove' the modem. For laptops, I guess they're
aiming at 'hot desking' environments and the availability of a cable
connection (whereas now a wireless connection might be assumed, but
clearly a cable may be a better/faster option). Peter M.
.
- References:
- The usual modem vs. router argument.
- From: Rupert
- Re: The usual modem vs. router argument.
- From: Peter
- Re: The usual modem vs. router argument.
- From: Alex Heney
- Re: The usual modem vs. router argument.
- From: PeeGee
- Re: The usual modem vs. router argument.
- From: Alex Heney
- Re: The usual modem vs. router argument.
- From: Mark McIntyre
- Re: The usual modem vs. router argument.
- From: Alex Heney
- The usual modem vs. router argument.
- Prev by Date: Re: The usual modem vs. router argument.
- Next by Date: ntl to uncap its 1Mbps and 2Mbps services
- Previous by thread: Re: The usual modem vs. router argument.
- Next by thread: Re: The usual modem vs. router argument.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading