Re: Channel groups post-DSO
- From: Mark Carver <mark.carver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:53:06 +0000
On 24/02/2010 22:30, Andy Wade wrote:
wrightsaerials@xxxxxxx wrote:etail in the big PDF cited at the end.
At last year's CAI show the vibes were that this was likely to go ahead,
but then things seem to have gone quiet, so <bleep> knows.
Can we rely on Mr Carver to come up with the latest info?
Doubtless :~)on
I'm in a hotel in Helsinki pissed currently, but my memory is Ofcom's end game is to have the UK UHF TV band running from, 21 to 30 and 39 to 61.
Ch 62 to be traded for Ch 39, which will lead to yet more changes at Winter Hill, Selkirk, Huntshaw Cross etc ?
--
Mark
Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply.
http://www.paras.org.uk/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Channel groups post-DSO
- From: wrightsaerials@xxxxxxx
- Re: Channel groups post-DSO
- References:
- Channel groups post-DSO
- From: wrightsaerials@xxxxxxx
- Re: Channel groups post-DSO
- From: Andy Wade
- Re: Channel groups post-DSO
- From: wrightsaerials@xxxxxxx
- Re: Channel groups post-DSO
- From: Andy Wade
- Channel groups post-DSO
- Prev by Date: Re: Channel groups post-DSO
- Next by Date: Re: Not Very Tangy
- Previous by thread: Re: Channel groups post-DSO
- Next by thread: Re: Channel groups post-DSO
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
