Re: Analogue captions
- From: "JohnT" <john31SPAMNOT@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 23:06:23 +0100
"jamie powell" <jamie_p84@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:haivm7$gk2$1@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Roderick Stewart" <rjfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:VA.000007da.00266bec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxIn article <haianu$igr$1@xxxxxxxx>, Jamie powell wrote:Well, I worked as a programmer in the summer holidays when I was at school, if
that counts?
In fact... you've probably used one particular piece of my software without
realising it, but I'm not saying where or why.
I've done lots of clever things too, but I'm not saying where or why. Do you
believe me?
My private life is none of your business, basically.
This is a public newsgroup - I have just as much right to post here as anyone else does, and I don't have to prove anything to a bunch of bitter old men who have absolutely no authority over me whatsoever.
If you are posting under your real name, or an approximation of it, then I think that there is already enough evidence on Usenet to dissuade anyone from employing you. But in any event, your attitudes towards others are a fairly clear indication that you would not ever be able to have a successful career at anything. But do please help me with one thing? What is it that you consider we as a bunch of bitter old men are bitter about?
--
JohnT
.
- References:
- Analogue captions
- From: jamie powell
- Re: Analogue captions
- From: Bill Wright
- Re: Analogue captions
- From: Mark Carver
- Re: Analogue captions
- From: jamie powell
- Re: Analogue captions
- From: JohnT
- Re: Analogue captions
- From: jamie powell
- Re: Analogue captions
- From: Bill Wright
- Re: Analogue captions
- From: jamie powell
- Re: Analogue captions
- From: Roderick Stewart
- Analogue captions
- Prev by Date: Re: What is this Sky TV hack?
- Next by Date: Re: What is this Sky TV hack?
- Previous by thread: Re: Analogue captions
- Next by thread: Re: Analogue captions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|