Re: Interesting report on LEDs in the most recent 'Science In Action'
- From: "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:38:40 +0100
In article <s7adnbomybX2j_rXnZ2dnUVZ8qmdnZ2d@xxxxxx>,
R. Mark Clayton <nospamclayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have an LED clock purchased in 1978 with all segments still working
after 250,000 hours. White LEDs are quoted at MTBF >50k hours, whereas
the best CFL's last about 12k hours. CFL's don't like power cycling.
There's a big difference in life between 'signal LEDs' as in your clock
and ones designed to provide illumination. If you under run a tungsten
lamp you vastly increase its life too.
--
*I wonder how much deeper the ocean would be without sponges*
Dave Plowman dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
.
- References:
- ROT: Interesting report on LEDs in the most recent 'Science In Action'
- From: Java Jive
- Re: Interesting report on LEDs in the most recent 'Science In Action'
- From: R. Mark Clayton
- ROT: Interesting report on LEDs in the most recent 'Science In Action'
- Prev by Date: Eye Care For You
- Next by Date: Re: Computer card for digital TV
- Previous by thread: Re: Interesting report on LEDs in the most recent 'Science In Action'
- Next by thread: Re: Interesting report on LEDs in the most recent 'Science In Action'
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading