Re: Question re reception BY relay stations
- From: Java Jive <java@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:58:45 +0100
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:23:47 +0100, Mark Carver
<mark.carver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Brian Gaff wrote:
In theory, given the very best reception, the quality loss for chained
stations should be less on digital than at present. I can recall in the 80s
watching in Guernsey with patterning being transmitted on stuff networked
from the mainland.
For my 40th, my ex-wife treated me to a holiday in Jersey so that we
could visit Gerald Durrell's Zoo, which I have supported financially
most of my life ...
http://www.durrell.org/
I too STR some rather iffy TV reception in the hotel room!
ISTR there's some concern ISTR about tandem chains used for DTT.
Re-buffering and re-clocking of the data is going to have to be applied
at each relay station. AIUI this on a chain of 5 or 6 hops will lead to
a delay of 10-20 seconds relative to the 'parent' signal ? Not a
problem as such, but you can forget the pips on R4 Freeview being of any
use at all !!
Seems a crazy way of doing it, why not just get them via satellite,
and have a skeletal terrestrial backup system ready in place in case
of 'hostile action by a foreign agency'?
I would have thought that DSO would have been a great chance to
rethink the whole layout. When they wanted to rebuild the Afghan
phone system after the war, it was easier to base it on mobiles than a
hard-wired structure. Similarly, I would have thought it would be so
much easier to just have transmitters get their signals from
satellite?
Or am I missing something?
======================================
Please always reply to news group as the email address in
this post's header does not exist. Alternatively, use one of the
contact addresses at:
http://www.macfh.co.uk/JavaJive/JavaJive.html
http://www.macfh.co.uk/Macfarlane/Macfarlane.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question re reception BY relay stations
- From: Mark Carver
- Re: Question re reception BY relay stations
- References:
- Re: Question re reception BY relay stations
- From: Mark Carver
- Re: Question re reception BY relay stations
- From: Java Jive
- Re: Question re reception BY relay stations
- From: Mark Carver
- Re: Question re reception BY relay stations
- From: Brian Gaff
- Re: Question re reception BY relay stations
- From: Mark Carver
- Re: Question re reception BY relay stations
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: FM transmitters
- Next by Date: Re: Question re reception BY relay stations
- Previous by thread: Re: Question re reception BY relay stations
- Next by thread: Re: Question re reception BY relay stations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|