Re: Component Video
- From: "R. Mark Clayton" <nospamclayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:23:53 -0000
"Geoff Lane" <datemasde.t1m@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:gi636j$nkl$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
My understanding of video is that to date scart has been the best way to
deliver video signals although the plug leaves a lot to be desired.
My slight confusion is over the advantages and disadvantages between
component, scart and hdmi. I appreciate scart and hdmi deliver sound as
well but other than that is there a major difference?
Geoff Lane
Have a look on Wiki!
Composite - whole TV video signal on one wire (limited horizontal colour
resolution in PAL).
S-video - TV signal on two wires (luminance and chrominance) sometimes
called Y/C
Component - three colours on three wires.
Scart 21 way. Can carry composite (both ways), S-video or component
(one way) plus sound.
Good for normal TV signals.
DVI - digital video signal - no sound
HDMI - digital video signal with sound (backward compatible with DVI).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Component Video
- From: Brian Gaff
- Re: Component Video
- From: Dave Plowman (News)
- Re: Component Video
- From: Mark Carver
- Re: Component Video
- From: Geoff Lane
- Re: Component Video
- From: Adrian C
- Re: Component Video
- References:
- Component Video
- From: Geoff Lane
- Component Video
- Prev by Date: Component Video
- Next by Date: Re: Oddest use for CT100?
- Previous by thread: Component Video
- Next by thread: Re: Component Video
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
