Re: Freeview Playback doomed?
- From: Dickie mint <richard_taylorspam01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:50:19 +0000
Paul D.Smith wrote:
"Dickie mint" <richard_taylorspam01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:60bmu0F1pom9gU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxPaul D.Smith wrote:That has everything to do with broadcasters misusing it and nothing to do with SL per se. Each variant should be a series of its own. Personal judgement as to whether that is better or worse than no SL at all ;-).But the Freeview Playback Spec would suggest that it *should* link all variants.
Paul DS.
Richard
Can you point me at the Freeview Playback spec please? That would seem to be rather odd, especially given the <Channel>, <Channel+1> type channels. Does this mean I should get two copies of everything :-(. ?
Paul DS
Schedule 4 on page 10 in :
http://www.freeview.co.uk/docs/manufacturer_licence.pdf
or :
http://www.freeview.co.uk/docs/retail_licence.pdf
which appear to be mostly the dame document1
Richard
.
- References:
- Freeview Playback doomed?
- From: Paul D.Smith
- Re: Freeview Playback doomed?
- From: Dickie mint
- Re: Freeview Playback doomed?
- From: Paul D.Smith
- Re: Freeview Playback doomed?
- From: Dickie mint
- Re: Freeview Playback doomed?
- From: Paul D.Smith
- Freeview Playback doomed?
- Prev by Date: Re: Freeview Playback doomed?
- Next by Date: Re: Freeview Playback doomed?
- Previous by thread: Re: Freeview Playback doomed?
- Next by thread: Re: Freeview Playback doomed?
- Index(es):