Re: BBC HD on Freeview proposal
- From: "Agamemnon" <agamemnon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:54:20 +0100
"DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab.is@dead> wrote in message news:ybQKi.4993$ao.1869@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Agamemnon wrote:
<snip>
I've just been through an endless cycle of monotony with you trying to tell me that a blind listening test uses compressed samples as its reference apparently in order to favour the codec that happened to beat the codec that you said performed better, all of which was pure nonsense, so I think I'll skip entering into a debate on another issue.
The fact is that AAC did not beat OGG Vorbis in a fair fight and the test you referred to was not conducted in a scientific manner but was statically weighted in favour of AAC by the introduction of a second AAC sample at 96kbps to use as a reference anchor.
But thanks for taking the time to respond, your idiotic views are always welcome.
FOOL!
--
Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: BBC HD on Freeview proposal
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: BBC HD on Freeview proposal
- References:
- BBC HD on Freeview proposal
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: BBC HD on Freeview proposal
- From: Agamemnon
- Re: BBC HD on Freeview proposal
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- BBC HD on Freeview proposal
- Prev by Date: Re: BBC HD on Freeview proposal
- Next by Date: Re: BBC HD on Freeview proposal
- Previous by thread: Re: BBC HD on Freeview proposal
- Next by thread: Re: BBC HD on Freeview proposal
- Index(es):