Re: What is best, wideband or grouped aerials diplexed?
- From: "Bill Wright" <insertmybusinessname@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 19:08:03 -0000
"Marky P" <effort@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:k87qp2lrhgsmralu5b94uppk50upt0a0ol@xxxxxxxxxx
Just wondering if there would be a higher gain using 2 aerialsYes they would, but in extremis it works well to install several aerials,
combined with a diplexer or a single wideband aerial? Apart from the
extra windload, would the signal losses through the diplexer make it
no better than a single w/b aerial?
each with its own masthead amp. After the amp combining losses are not
important. However, it's usually not a perfect solution to combine using a
diplexer because noise from the 'other' amp lifts the noise floor. Better to
use channel filters. If you do use a diplexer, both amps should have the
same gain, otherwise reception from the aerial with the lowest gain amp is
likely to be buggered up comprehensively.
Marky, I don't see why I should do all the writing. Please explain why my
last statement is true. Come on, think about it. It's easy. Here's a clue:
diplexers are imperfect.
Bill
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What is best, wideband or grouped aerials diplexed?
- From: Marky P
- Re: What is best, wideband or grouped aerials diplexed?
- References:
- What is best, wideband or grouped aerials diplexed?
- From: Marky P
- What is best, wideband or grouped aerials diplexed?
- Prev by Date: TV via GPS?
- Next by Date: Re: What is best, wideband or grouped aerials diplexed?
- Previous by thread: Re: What is best, wideband or grouped aerials diplexed?
- Next by thread: Re: What is best, wideband or grouped aerials diplexed?
- Index(es):