Re: De-Lurk Plus Why Bother with DTT?
- From: steve <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:02:32 +0000
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:11:10 +0000, Richard Cole wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 21:28:13 +0000, steve <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>So do the different boxes, on/off up/down vol+/-. You like Sky because it
>>is simple and you cannot deal with learning a new remote every few years,
>>for the rest that can managed that feat, we'd like the choice of options
>>thanks.
>>How do you deal with other things in life, not all buses are the same,
>>trains, other peoples houses - do you pee in peoples cloakrooms perhaps
>>because they are not in the same place as yours?
>
> No Sky is going as soon as I get around to phoning up and canceling.
>
> Check my previous postings (not in this NG 'cos this is my first here),
> I'm a (very) experienced IT professional, so change doesn't bother me, but
> your spurious comments really pissed me off.
You ought to stop being so bloody sensitive then especially replies to
other people.
And being an IT professional means nothing any idiot calls them self one
that mans a support desk, you cannot understand the difference between
digital audio out and analogue audio out or capturing off air MPEG and
capturing decoded analogue MPEG to re-compress.
> Bye bye Steve <<<plonk>>>
Indeed, snip your embarrassing points, then la la la not listening.
See ya.
.
- References:
- De-Lurk Plus Why Bother with DTT?
- From: zikkimalambo
- Re: De-Lurk Plus Why Bother with DTT?
- From: David
- Re: De-Lurk Plus Why Bother with DTT?
- From: steve
- Re: De-Lurk Plus Why Bother with DTT?
- From: steve
- De-Lurk Plus Why Bother with DTT?
- Prev by Date: Re: Masthead Amplifier
- Next by Date: Sudbury ITV Channels deteriorated to nothing over last 2/3 evenings... did I miss a meeting?
- Previous by thread: Re: De-Lurk Plus Why Bother with DTT?
- Next by thread: Re: De-Lurk Plus Why Bother with DTT?
- Index(es):