Re: 16:9 or 4:3 ?
- From: "Adrian" <anca@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:35:43 -0000
Gordon Hudson wrote:
> "Doz" <Doz@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:ysowjbtls57d$.e1soj4qlfiyo.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Personally I love my widescreen....
>>
>> http://www.widescreen.org/widescreen.shtml
>>
>> http://www.thedigitalbits.com/articles/anamorphic/
>
> In the USA they have not moved to widescreen because there are
> hundreds of broadcasters compared to the three or four we have in the
> UK.
The USA are moiving to widescreen quite rapidly, mainly due to the
introduction of Hi-Def. Over 90% of recent American programs shown here are
widescreen.
--
Adrian A
.
- References:
- 16:9 or 4:3 ?
- From: Doz
- Re: 16:9 or 4:3 ?
- From: Gordon Hudson
- 16:9 or 4:3 ?
- Prev by Date: Re: 16:9 or 4:3 ?
- Next by Date: Re: Why don't they switch off analogue NOW ?!
- Previous by thread: Re: 16:9 or 4:3 ?
- Next by thread: Re: 16:9 or 4:3 ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|