Re: When is wide not wide?
- From: "Dom Robinson" <google@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 Dec 2005 17:03:07 -0800
half_pint wrote:
> > "Pixels per inch" is a metric that only has a meaning when an image is
> > displayed at a given target image size. Since the image size broadcast
> > remains constant, the pixels per inch value will vary in direct
> > proportion with the screen dimensions. Bigger screens will hence in
> > effect have a lower pixel density. So a 10" wide display will have more
> > pixels per inch than a 20" display. This will remain true regardless of
> > aspect ratio. Put simply, bigger TV screens do not show any more picture
> > detail.
>
> Widescreen is much lower in horizontal resolution as its pixels are less
> square, it's a case of more width paid for my lower horizontal resolution.
LOL! This clearly proves even further what a complete loon you are.
Apart from the golden ratio of 1.61:1 for our vision having been
pointed out to you before, hence we see closer to 16:9 than 4:3,
there's so many things wrong with your statement "Widescreen is much
lower in horizontal resolution as its pixels are less square" that show
how full of shit you really are.
Can't wait for your reply so I can laugh at you some more.
Dom
.
- References:
- Re: When is wide not wide?
- From: simtan
- Re: When is wide not wide?
- From: half_pint
- Re: When is wide not wide?
- From: John Rumm
- Re: When is wide not wide?
- From: half_pint
- Re: When is wide not wide?
- From: John Rumm
- Re: When is wide not wide?
- From: half_pint
- Re: When is wide not wide?
- Prev by Date: Re: HD TV & Freeview !!!
- Next by Date: Re: Adverts on ITV3
- Previous by thread: Re: When is wide not wide?
- Next by thread: Re: When is wide not wide?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|