Re: I had to laff.


"Paul D" <Paul@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:qCUlf.4839$iz3.407@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Aztech wrote:
> > "half_pint" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:w6Nlf.162$q4.76@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > <
> >>> From looking at the details for Narnia it appears to be filmed in
> >>> Panavision, as would be expected unless it was a really cheap
> >>> production, which means they use anamorphic lenses to horizontally
> >>> compress the image on to the film by a factor of 2:1 onto the 4:3
> >>> cell. So it wasn't "shot in 4:3", if you viewed this image in 4:3
> >>> then everyone would resemble a stick
> >>> man, a 4:3 image could only be produced by panning and scanning the
> >>> 2:35:1
> >>> image. The 2:35:1 image would be the *entire* image, that is the
> >>> original and hasn't been created from anything else.
> >>
> >> It is obvious to anyone with half a brain that a 2.35:1 ratio is only
> >> suitable
> >> for about 10% or less of 'shots', Our own eyes use a 1:1 ratio
> >> (round) because our brains have evolved
> >
> > Your brain has obviously evolved beyond everyone else on the planet,
> > either that or you're a fish that has learnt to type. Most people
> > that haven't yet gone through x-men style evolution have considerable
> > more lateral peripheral vision vertical, it's explained by the simple
> > fact that your eyes are side by side.
> >
> > The fact that people 'like' widescreen owes much to the golden ratio,
> > Gustav Fechner did numerous experiments on this in the 19th century,
> > when subjects are presented with a range of rectangles they
> > invariably pick out as most pleasing ones whose sides are most
> > approximate to the divine proportion. (Phi = 1.618 and 16:9
> > widescreen is 1.777)
> > As for your "anyone with half a brain" are you referring to a
> > lobotomy or something?
> >
> > http://japanld.free.fr/help_ratio.php
>
>
> An amusing and succinct reply.
>
> Now halfpint, can you answer those points? I bet you can't, so you'll
ignore
> them as usual.
>
> Why do you have this bizarre perspective on widescreen, when it's as plain
> as day that you're wrong? Do you enjoy the pointless confrontation?
>
> Perhaps there's nothing going on in your life so you have to fill it by
> endlessly going over the same non-arguments on usenet, losing every time
but
> still coming back for more, regurgitating the same tedious, ignorant, ill
> thought out nonsense which convinces nobody in the world except you.
>
> Perhaps mental illness runs in your family? You really do come across as
> someone who is not right in the head, so maybe you should take stock and
try
> and get some help to deal with this obsession.
>


An extremely dubious experiment carried out by a blind physco fraudster.

http://www.math.dartmouth.edu/~matc/math5.geometry/unit12/unit12.html
"But, when measuring frames in a museum, Fechner found that the favorite
ratios were:
for vertical pictures 5:4 or 1.25 to 1
for horizontal pictures about 4:3 or 1.33 to 1"


Omitted that bit didn't you, how careless of you, in a real unrigged
experiment the preferred ratio was 4:3.

And not these shapes were chosen by artists not easilly gulible patients
with mental illnesses.

You lose.

You lost man, you lost, you lost every arguement and I won every single one
as I always
have done on this matter.

Admit it you know I Am right and you are just trolling.

I have blown apart evey widescreen myth, they all crumble when but to
the test.
Thats becasue I am right.










>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: I had to laff.
    ... > Aztech wrote: ... >>> because our brains have evolved ... >> Gustav Fechner did numerous experiments on this in the 19th century, ... experiment the preferred ratio was 4:3. ...
    (uk.tech.digital-tv)
  • OT: Its the intelligence, stupid!
    ... The Republicans lost the battle of ideas even more comprehensively ... its ability to link brains with brawn. ... Another reason is the degeneracy of the conservative ...
    (alt.guitar.amps)
  • OT: The Republican Party...Idiots Welcome
    ... The Republicans lost the battle of ideas even more comprehensively ... its ability to link brains with brawn. ... Another reason is the degeneracy of the conservative ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: calculator for resistive divider using standard resistor values?
    ... > Hi - I feel like I saw this somewhere but have since lost the link. ... > was a website where you could put in the ratio you want a resistive ... > resistor values that would yield that ratio. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Brent, you idiot...
    ... You ought to be deeply ashamed for posting such an obvious piece of ... whackjob/scam to this board. ... Have you lost the little brains you seem ...
    (sci.med.diseases.lyme)
Loading