Re: Which Freeview Box is Best?
- From: "harrogate2" <harrogate2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 14:54:47 GMT
"Roderick Stewart" <rjfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:VA.00000bfe.0175ca1f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <dh69qo$96t$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kim wrote:
> > > Since all the necessary audio and video signals are already
> > > available as separate signals on separate wires, and will be
required as
> > > separate signals in the TV set no more than 2 metres away, the
simplest
> > > way
> > > of getting them there is to keep them the way they are - i.e.
separate.
> >
> > That's the simplest way for the manufacturer, not for the
consumer.
>
> Why do you think it would be any more complicated for anybody? You
have to
> plug a cable of some sort between your DVD player and/or digital
receiver and
> the TV set in any case. The only practical difference it makes is
that you
> plug one sort of cable instead of another sort of cable. One sort of
plug has
> a single pin in the middle and the other sort has lots of pins, but
even if
> you've no idea what all the pins are for or what difference it
makes, you
> simply put the plug into the only socket that fits it. Hardly
brain-taxing.
>
> In fact, a SCART connection is potentially easier for a
non-technical punter
> because there is no need to identify and tune in a spare channel on
the TV,
> possibly also having to change the output channels of the devices
feeding it
> if the frequencies happen to clash. All you have to do is select
"AV".
>
> Rod.
>
Er. maybe it's because the manufacturers make an international product
which would need to have different RF parameters for different
countries, be it PAL B/G/H/I, Secam, or whatever. Give 'em all a SCART
and you have a product that works anywhere without different
engineering.
On the same line, has anyone noticed that TV's sold in Europe are (and
have been for a long time) mostly multi-standard, whereas in the UK
it's only in the last couple of years that these have become
available?
--
Woody
harrogate2 at ntlworld dot com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which Freeview Box is Best?
- From: Dave Plowman (News)
- Re: Which Freeview Box is Best?
- From: kim
- Re: Which Freeview Box is Best?
- References:
- Which Freeview Box is Best?
- From: Mike
- Re: Which Freeview Box is Best?
- From: Scott
- Re: Which Freeview Box is Best?
- From: Mike
- Re: Which Freeview Box is Best?
- From: André Coutanche
- Re: Which Freeview Box is Best?
- From: David Taylor
- Re: Which Freeview Box is Best?
- From: Albert Grennock
- Re: Which Freeview Box is Best?
- From: Albert Grennock
- Re: Which Freeview Box is Best?
- From: Albert Grennock
- Re: Which Freeview Box is Best?
- From: Albert Grennock
- Re: Which Freeview Box is Best?
- From: kim
- Re: Which Freeview Box is Best?
- From: Roderick Stewart
- Which Freeview Box is Best?
- Prev by Date: Re: Which Freeview Box is Best?
- Next by Date: Re: Aerial Question.
- Previous by thread: Re: Which Freeview Box is Best?
- Next by thread: Re: Which Freeview Box is Best?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|