Re: Laywoman's view of analogue switch off
- From: "kim" <ntscuser@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 17:48:30 +0100
"JohnT" <johnhillriseSPAMNOT@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3p5dk4F8mo32U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "John Porcella" <bronson69@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:dgjr70$47r$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> <wrightsaerials@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:1126919813.729769.64840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Said to me today:
>> "Some of them on here they grumble about it, having to pay £50 for a
>> box. But what they don't seem to realise is, they'll save that over and
>> over again because they won't have to buy the license any more."
>>
>> Perhaps this person was referring to those over 70?
>>
>
> ....who would be looking forward to age 75, at which time their TV Licence
> would be free?
Yes, even if they are millionaires."Free" to them, paid for by the rest of
us.
(kim)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Laywoman's view of analogue switch off
- From: :::Jerry::::
- Re: Laywoman's view of analogue switch off
- References:
- Laywoman's view of analogue switch off
- From: wrightsaerials@xxxxxxx
- Re: Laywoman's view of analogue switch off
- From: John Porcella
- Re: Laywoman's view of analogue switch off
- From: JohnT
- Laywoman's view of analogue switch off
- Prev by Date: Re: Laywoman's view of analogue switch off
- Next by Date: Re: Communial aerial appears to be buggered :-(
- Previous by thread: Re: Laywoman's view of analogue switch off
- Next by thread: Re: Laywoman's view of analogue switch off
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|