Re: Laywoman's view of analogue switch off
- From: ":::Jerry::::" <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 09:29:34 +0100
"Aztech" <no@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:TKOWe.73457$s35.68069@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > <wrightsaerials@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:1126919813.729769.64840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Said to me today:
> > "Some of them on here they grumble about it, having to pay £50
for a
> > box. But what they don't seem to realise is, they'll save that
over and
> > over again because they won't have to buy the license any more."
>
> Lol, so *that's* what they mean by the "with no subscription fee"
bit. There
> be method in their madness.
>
> It bet that one never crossed the minds of the BBC marketing bods.
>
Probably not, seeing that they obviously know the difference between
the legal need to have a licence to own (use) a TV and that of
needing a subscription to view certain channels....
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Laywoman's view of analogue switch off
- From: Aztech
- Re: Laywoman's view of analogue switch off
- References:
- Laywoman's view of analogue switch off
- From: wrightsaerials@xxxxxxx
- Re: Laywoman's view of analogue switch off
- From: Aztech
- Laywoman's view of analogue switch off
- Prev by Date: Re: Laywoman's view of analogue switch off
- Next by Date: Re: Laywoman's view of analogue switch off
- Previous by thread: Re: Laywoman's view of analogue switch off
- Next by thread: Re: Laywoman's view of analogue switch off
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
