Re: [slightly off] Noise reduction plug-ins for Sound Forge
- From: Bill <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 23:21:22 +0100
In message <slrnfb9p7n.hf.pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Paul Martin <pm@xxxxxxxxxx> writes
The problem with these DSP-based noise removal systems is that the result is often very synthetic-sounding. You'll never remove the interference completely without affecting the desired material.
A buzz is going to be rich in harmonics, covering most of the audio spectrum. It's easier to remove than white noise. After noise removal you're going to end up with audio that's been through the DSP equivalent of a comb filter. It might not be any more pleasant to listen to than the original, flawed recording.
Don't let me put you off trying, though.
The thing about Adobe Audition, if you haven't tried it, is that you get so many alternative noise reduction options.
Things like being able to Lasso areas or frequency ranges, and then apply selective processes.
It's not for the faint hearted, though. You do need to be serious and prepared to spend a reasonable amount of time on a trial and error basis.
Often a combination of subtle processes will work wonders without too many side effects.
--
Bill
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [slightly off] Noise reduction plug-ins for Sound Forge
- From: SpamTrapSeeSig
- Re: [slightly off] Noise reduction plug-ins for Sound Forge
- References:
- [slightly off] Noise reduction plug-ins for Sound Forge
- From: SpamTrapSeeSig
- Re: [slightly off] Noise reduction plug-ins for Sound Forge
- From: Bill
- Re: [slightly off] Noise reduction plug-ins for Sound Forge
- From: Graham Harvest
- [slightly off] Noise reduction plug-ins for Sound Forge
- Prev by Date: Re: Conclusion to my caravan aerial problem
- Next by Date: Re: How good were 1950's/1960's Band 1 TV receivers?
- Previous by thread: Re: [slightly off] Noise reduction plug-ins for Sound Forge
- Next by thread: Re: [slightly off] Noise reduction plug-ins for Sound Forge
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading