Re: DRM Test
- From: funkmish <funkmish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:18:00 +0100
Ian Jelf wrote:
In message <MtPSZGT+NeLGFw5I@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, SpamTrapSeeSig
<no-one@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
In article <xklXh.6895$mk4.915@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David
<david.park@xxxxxxxxx> writes
Picked this up on another post
http://www.bbc.co.uk/digitalradio/news/#section
Any reports on DRM quaulity?
"100 Devon radio listeners will be eagerly tuning into BBC Radio Devon
using a brand new technology to UK listeners, Digital Radio Mondiale
(DRM) from 23rd April."
Hmm.
At risk of being overly pedantic, why not fix the other digital
service first?
The Devon experiment was reported on Spotlight last night. Although it
might well have some merit, the facts in the report were somewhat
bizarrely presented. Things like "we've always had trouble on Medium
Wave" were being bandied about; I couldn't help but wonder why they
weren't listening on VHF.......
Yes, I know there are places where VHF can be dodgy but the report
implied that the *concept* of Medium Wave and VHF was poor in itself and
that DRM (they called it "Digital Medium Wave", which is fair enough)
was what the world had been waiting for.
The BBC have decided not to use the term DRM to avoid confusion with
Digital Rights Management.
So they are going with Digital Medium Wave or DMW.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DRM Test
- From: Bill Wright
- Re: DRM Test
- From: charles
- Re: DRM Test
- References:
- DRM Test
- From: David
- Re: DRM Test
- From: SpamTrapSeeSig
- Re: DRM Test
- From: Ian Jelf
- DRM Test
- Prev by Date: Re: Snooker interactive feed
- Next by Date: Re: DRM Test
- Previous by thread: Re: DRM Test
- Next by thread: Re: DRM Test
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|