Re: First digital TV switch date set
- From: Bruce Stewart <bruce_stewart@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 02:42:56 GMT
Zero Tolerance wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 08:57:34 +0100, NOSPAM <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Because they completely ignore or deny *any* responsibility for the
I find it very worrying that someone is prepared to admit that they have
no knowledge of the treatment of PoWs by the Japanese during WWII yet is
prepared to compare it with the treatment of prisoners by the British.
I'm not comparing the treatment - there is no question what the
Japanese military did back then is completely unacceptable and has no
place in a civilised society.
The point is, how do you feel having people making blanket statements
about your culture, based ONLY on the actions of your country's
military during wartime?
activities of The Ever Victorious Army.
Yes, the Japanese committed awful atrocities during the war. ThatYou obviously haven't heard about the rising tide of Nationalism within
doesn't mean that they don't have a respectful culture, as a whole.
Almost no-one alive in Japan today supports, sympathises with, or
justifies the actions of their military some 60 years ago. It's
unreasonable to make blanket statements about "Japs" (itself an
offensive term) based on that small fragment of knowledge and nothing
wider than that.
Japan, which is being fuelled by the ignoring Japans actions during WWII
almost thoughout their education system.
Infact a system has been generated which is creating the type of scenario
which creates the kind of resentment seen in pre-war Germany.
Otherwise, if you DO think that way, then the parallel is that our ownWTF?
English "culture" is as horrific and atrocious as the acts of rape,
torture, murder, and worse, committed in our name in foreign
countries. Are you still comfortable with that argument?
Comparing the activities of soldiers who were punished for any activities to
the organised and systematic rape and torture throughout The East-Asia
Co-Prosperity Sphere, is at best astonishing.
You can't have this both ways. Either both of those statements areA false dichotomy.
true, or neither of them are.
--
Bruce S.
--
Replace the by by blueyonder
.
- References:
- Re: First digital TV switch date set
- From: J. P. Gilliver
- Re: First digital TV switch date set
- From: Bill Wright
- Re: First digital TV switch date set
- From: Roderick Stewart
- Re: First digital TV switch date set
- From: SpamTrapSeeSig
- Re: First digital TV switch date set
- From: tony sayer
- Re: First digital TV switch date set
- From: charles
- Re: First digital TV switch date set
- From: Richard Lamont
- Re: First digital TV switch date set
- From: Ivor Jones
- Re: First digital TV switch date set
- From: Zero Tolerance
- Re: First digital TV switch date set
- From: Ian Jelf
- Re: First digital TV switch date set
- From: Zero Tolerance
- Re: First digital TV switch date set
- From: Bill Wright
- Re: First digital TV switch date set
- From: Zero Tolerance
- Re: First digital TV switch date set
- From: charles
- Re: First digital TV switch date set
- From: Zero Tolerance
- Re: First digital TV switch date set
- From: NOSPAM
- Re: First digital TV switch date set
- From: Zero Tolerance
- Re: First digital TV switch date set
- Prev by Date: Re: First digital TV switch date set
- Next by Date: Re: First digital TV switch date set
- Previous by thread: Re: First digital TV switch date set
- Next by thread: Re: First digital TV switch date set
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|