Re: DAB quality (or not)
- From: Chris Youlden <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:07:55 +0000 (UTC)
John Gilliver wrote:
[] Yes, I remember the time when radio 4, for example, only turned it on when it was broadcasting stereo material - thus giving better reception to many the rest of the time! (Especially since many stereo radios don't have a "mono" switch.) I genuinely don't know why they stopped doing it: I can only assume the reason was financial (including technical-financial, i. e. catering for the control signal, and the time of the person whose 1/100 of a job it was to monitor and control it, was exceeding the cost of the extra power used), added to a small contribution from the thought that some people would think there was something wrong with their set if the red light wasn't on.
I was intrigued to read in this thread that some pirates are indeed switching to mono.
It was for much the same reasons as for switching the PAL colour burst on and off
which also used to happen for mono programmes.
Firstly, on many receivers there was a 'splat' when the switch occurred, and secondly
as described in other posts, the FM signal is often more noisy when the pilot tone
is on than not.
It was nothing to do with finance. Engineers were more important than bean-counters
in those days ;-)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DAB quality (or not)
- From: John Gilliver
- Re: DAB quality (or not)
- References:
- DAB quality (or not)
- From: John Gilliver
- Re: DAB quality (or not)
- From: John Gilliver
- DAB quality (or not)
- Prev by Date: Re: DAB quality (or not)
- Next by Date: Re: Radio 3 rumble!.
- Previous by thread: Re: DAB quality (or not)
- Next by thread: Re: DAB quality (or not)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|