Re: Free drop


"John Turner" <jgturner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:8H97f.17777$R5.1666@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Sam" <Sam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:djh1bs$kh8$1$8300dec7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>> "John Turner" <jgturner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:HBT6f.17736$R5.1536@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> "Sam" <Sam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:djghqf$69r$1$830fa17d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> "david s-a" <dsantwyk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>> news:3rvvddFlim0kU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> John Laird wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It boils down to: don't take any chances. Make sure the NPR is
>>>>>> definitely
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>>>> I see no problem with the incident being reported by 'an outsider',
>>>>> after the round had been completed.......if it hadn't been reported
>>>>> she would have 'got away with it'.........not an attitude to be
>>>>> encouraged on the professional tour....or anywhere else for that
>>>>> matter!
>>>>>
>>>>> cheers
>>>>> david
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dont you think there ought to be a statute of limitations for golfing
>>>> offences just as there is for criminal offences? For example:
>>>> * Minor misdemeanours expire at the end of the round
>>>> * Major misdemeanours expire at the end of the competition
>>>> * Felonies never expire?
>>>> --
>>>> Sam
>>>> He uses statistics as others use lamp posts: for support rather than
>>>> illumination
>>>> (Remove cap to reply)
>>>>
>>> No, actually I think the Rules of Golf cover it quite adequately.
>>>
>>
>> What is 'it'?
>>
>> --
>> Sam
>> He uses statistics as others use lamp posts: for support rather than
>> illumination
>> (Remove cap to reply)
> The need for a statute of limitations.
>
> John T
Does anyone know whether the expression in 34-1 "When the official result
has been announced" , in relation to a 72 hole event, applies only to the 72
hole result. I assume there is some reference to this in the competition
conditions.

Cheers

John T


.

Relevant Pages