Re: [SBL 05/06] - Quantum Betunt


"Dat" <dat_004@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5o7il11uoetqha9nbajq50joc5kfvhb4n3@xxxxxxxxxx
> I don't like this at all, not a bit, but if you've gone to all the
> trouble of including it in the comp then I'm happy to tag along. Your
> instincts with regard to the SBL have been way better than mine to
> date. In fact, I don't recall you putting a foot wrong in what is
> becoming an increasingly more complicated system. (I'm not including
> dropped figures as that's obviously a Windows problem...everything
> else is.)

Well, it seems I got it all totally mingmonged here, in that Ben never
challenged me to ProEvo in the first place, which I thought he had. Someone
else did.

Luckily, I allowed for this sort of thing when I wrote the Quantum Bet***
rules, and as Ben is quite sensibly voting 'no' the whole thing is clearly
off. So, in a way, I guess I got it right again.

Good for me.


--
Joe

"Where the *** is my entry?" - Sir Benjamin Nunn


.

Loading