Re: Pope - near miss ...

On 29 Mar, 22:50, Pope Pompous XVIII <knock...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Gods of Europe (18+5) wrote :





"Pope Pompous XVIII" <knock...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mn.ed3c7d939428b3fe.63262@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Best team in the world explained :
"WTH" <harvestt...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mKPzl.22106$9a.2041@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Blackmore" <ghlll> wrote in message
news:3_idndUwb-VLXlLUnZ2dnUVZ8vSWnZ2d@xxxxxxxxx

"Mozzer" <mozzer.moz...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:gqofai$f3h$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Gods of Europe (18+5)" <l...@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:00183bd9$0$2069$c3e8da3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Mozzer" <mozzer.moz...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:gqoeo0$abm$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Gods of Europe (18+5)" <l...@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:00182a36$0$2057$c3e8da3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Timmy,

I don't recall seeing an answer to this..

Who put the brown wide eyes on the butterfly's wings? (c) James..

I can't see butterflies being smart enough to think that's what
they
needed to be hard to spot for predators, did their cells
subconsciously
form themselves in this way by fluke?

I think you'll find an answer to my question is more pressing
than
yours -
answer this and it might open the floodgates? Perhaps try some
peyote or
god's flesh to help you on the way - good luck!

Regards

Ted

Just Google, that's why the internet was invented,
There are numerous academic explanations for it. For example

http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/61006930/PDFSTART

This is a scientific document that fails to address the
fundamental
questions.

I wish I could study and assimilate 11 page scientific journals in
5
minutes, are you sure it  fails to address the  question?

I am still waiting for a sensible answer.

Like a big bearded man put eyes on butterflys wings?

Who said he had a beard?  You making things up?

Are you suggesting he gets up in a disguise before anyone does a
painting of him?  You crazy ***...

   WTH

LOL

Timmy, if I may, since it appears you ask all the questions, and I
never get to ask them, or at least have the few I ask, answered. So
humbly I put to you this question once more, since we are on the topic
of bearded divinities: how *and why* did the image of a crucified man
come to appear *in negative* on a linen cloth that is at least 700
years old?  Neither you, nor WTH, nor Jesper, nor Mozzer, nor any other
critic of Christianity has answered this question, despite my having
asked it nearly three years ago. To me that is the height of rudeness,
especially given your insistence that I answer all of your questions.

Please, give it your best shot. For your convenience I provide you with
a link to the original and negative image, side by side: on the left is
the face on the cloth as it appears to the naked eye; on the right, the
face on the cloth as it appears on a photographic negative (the first
time this was seen was in 1898, by Italian lawyer/amateur photographer
Socondo Pia). As you can see with your own eyes, the negative image on
the right is in fact a positive image, which can only mean one thing:
the original is a negative. So how? And why? Please answer this
question. It is the only question I ask you to do me the courtesy of a
sincere and truthful answer.

http://shroudencounter.com/bodyimages/posnegface.jpg

Da Vinci's image

Even da Vinci could not paint an image of a crucified man blood first.

Do you realise there is no image on the Shroud under those areas where
there is blood, suggesting the image was imprinted on the cloth at some
point after the blood? What kind of genius would paint the blood first,
and then the image?  And why would he paint real blood on the shroud
and then go to the trouble of painting the image in negative?  
Seriously Ted - WHY?????

There is only one conclusion possible.

--
+ His Holiness Pope Pompous XVIII

"Shakespeare is possessed through and through with the feeling which is
the first and finest idea of Catholicism that truth exists whether we
like it or not, and that it is for us to accommodate ourselves to it
... " - G. K . Chesterton- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I know you you place a lot of significance on the shroud. I'd like to
know how this shroud could possibly prove the existance of God. Even
if it was somehow proved show the person known as Jesus, how does the
supernatural aspect arise (no pun intended).
.

Loading