Re: Lee vs Flintoff: The injury competition
- From: Declan Murphy <declan_murphy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 01:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 8, 12:18 am, Richard Dixon <rdngem...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 7 July, 13:01, Declan Murphy <declan_mur...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm just relieved.
Brett Lee is an over the hill pie chucker ineffective in English
conditions, but with the advantage of some good PR spinners.
Did you see the 5-wicket spell in the game vs. England A ? I would beg
to differ.
I did, but still don't think he should have even been included in the
squad. Siddle & Johnson have earned their spurs.
Mitchell Johnson and Peter Siddle for the new ball
Clark at this change
Hilfenhaus or McDonald depending on the conditions.
Hauritz trundling out the bar and serving the gin & tonics.
Cannot Clarke and Hussey offer some back-up?
I don't know if Hussey knows much about gin & tonic.
.
- References:
- Lee vs Flintoff: The injury competition
- From: Richard Dixon
- Re: Lee vs Flintoff: The injury competition
- From: Luke Curtis
- Re: Lee vs Flintoff: The injury competition
- From: rterhart@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lee vs Flintoff: The injury competition
- From: Richard Dixon
- Re: Lee vs Flintoff: The injury competition
- From: Declan Murphy
- Re: Lee vs Flintoff: The injury competition
- From: Richard Dixon
- Lee vs Flintoff: The injury competition
- Prev by Date: Should have been capped for England but never were?
- Next by Date: Re: Should have been capped for England but never were?
- Previous by thread: Re: Lee vs Flintoff: The injury competition
- Next by thread: Rajasthan vs Middlesex
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
