Re: hawkeye game

"David North" <dnorth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>"max.it" <max.it@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:42deccb8.20338230@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> "David North" <dnorth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>>"max.it" <max.it@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>news:42de6cea.26197932@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> "David North" <dnorth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>>>"Alan OBrien" <alaneobrienSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>>news:9ZlDe.2141$Pf3.757@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Dave L" <dave_the_glammy_fan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:ehlDe.5689$je1.3764@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> > "Jim Brant" <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
>>>>>> > news:dbjt5s$u0q$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> "max.it" <max.it@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>>> >> news:42dd6064.46235489@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> Has anyone tried this game ?
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> http://www.ecb.co.uk/kids/cricket-game-details.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > I gave 3 not out.
>>>>>> > It showed that 2 didn't hit the stumps and the third pitched outside leg
>>>>>> > and it told me I was incorrect!!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...I noticed that - and yet if the ball is missing the off stump it gives
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> out (correctly) because the batsman is not playing a shot.
>>>>>
>>>>>Eh? If it's missing the stumps, it's not out, full stop.
>>>>
>>>> I know the one, it hits him outside, but there is about an eigth of the ball
>>>> covering the off stump on the replay from behind.
>>>
>>>I'm not sure I saw that one, but it sounds like in real life it would be
>>>firmly
>>>in benefit-of-the-doubt territory.
>>
>> I know, but It's still shitty when you get it wrong on a computer.
>>
>>>
>>>There's one it says is out that pitched outside off stump and went wider.
>>
>> The same deliveries come along in the same order every time.
>
>Not if you close the window and reload.

I never thought of that, it's not gonna help me get a better score.

>
>> A pencil and paper or a good memory will get you loads of points.
>>
>> You haven't confessed your score yet mate, or have I missed it.
>
>Not many the first couple of times. Got about 2000 when I tried again later
>though.

massive, I'm going to try again.

>
>I think I'd make a poor umpire. My concentration isn't good enough.

Scoring is worse,
I have had the book removed from me twice already this season,
and I was only copying over.

max.it

>--
>David North
>Email to this address will be deleted as spam
>Use usenetATlaneHYPHENfarm.fsnet.co.uk
>
>

.