Re: Climategate
- From: "Col" <reddwarfer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 18:26:25 -0000
Dawlish wrote:
You really need to look at the outcomes, as your arguments and
personal beliefs appear wholly unpersuasive.
The warmest 10 years in a 130 year sequence have occurred in the last
11 years. Only 2 of the last 36 months (and longer, I stopped looking
at 3 years back) haven't fallen into the top 10 for that month in a
130 years sequence. Remember, those figures are reflected in *all 5*
of the satellite and surface records, to a greater, or lesser, degree
Against those figures, your political, conspiratorial rhetoric falls
apart. With those figures, how can you believe that GW is not
continuing?
He'll just dismiss them as falsifyed data.
All part of the conspiracy, y'see......
--
Col
Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
.
- References:
- Climategate
- From: Len Wood
- Re: Climategate
- From: N_Cook
- Re: Climategate
- From: Weatherlawyer
- Re: Climategate
- From: Natsman
- Re: Climategate
- From: Dawlish
- Climategate
- Prev by Date: Re: Climategate
- Next by Date: Re: Climategate
- Previous by thread: Re: Climategate
- Next by thread: Re: Climategate
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|