Re: Is this a trendy new phenomina?
- From: "Lawrence Jenkins" <lawrence13@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 22:05:31 +0100
"Dawlish" <pjgno1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0ec9c51d-2a6b-459f-afa7-23f122f5a108@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Aug 30, 7:13 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" <lawrenc...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
"Dawlish" <pjg...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e137d585-5df0-48d2-b078-214232207873@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Aug 30, 4:51 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" <lawrenc...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
"Dawlish" <pjg...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:56f0369f-69ed-4bec-a643-b7c5b77d9522@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Aug 30, 3:02 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" <lawrenc...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hmmm the Arctic late summer ice extent has increased steadily since
2007
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png
http://arctic-roos.org/observations/satellite-data/sea-ice/ice-area-a...
http://www.ijis.iarc.uaf.edu/en/home/seaice_extent.htm
Okay but how is the sarf pole doing me old cocksparrers
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images//daily_images/S_timeseries.png
Clearly we are now seeing the most feraed aspects of AGW . MORE
ICE!!!!!
Codswallop - and learn to spell, please.
One word mistakenly typed and that's all you can say?
Please address the question: Why is the ice recovering when the world
has
been beset by AGW?
Do you ever laugh?
Only at you when you post codswallop. *>))
Look a little more carefully at this.
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/global.daily.ice.area....
Then, seeing as you have raised it AGAIN; would you kindly explain to
us why you feel that the amount of Antarctic Sea ice is a pointer to
GW having stopped?
Finally, may I respectfully point out that you didn't actually ask a
question in your first post on this thread. You just made some highly
inaccurate statements based on a worrying lack of understanding -
AGAIN.
Interesting link that clearly shows the global ice on the rebound, thanks
for that. So what's happening, why is the ice cover growing and not
shrinking. Can you expalin that?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Oh god.
2007 was so extreme a low that to exceed again is bound to take time.
We've had exactly one year's summer low since then and that was way
below anything before 2007. There's still 2/3 weeks melting left of
2007. You are showing so painfully clearly that you don't understand
trends and the variations around a mean within a trend.
Antarctic ice cover has not got the simple relationship to temperature
that you feel is the case. You have shown time and again that you
don't understand that and that you can't explain your position with
regard to Antarctic ice.
Just over a month ago, you did predict, with one of your many, many,
silly snapshots of this melt season, that all the different indicators
were pointing to a record low in 2009, didn't you?
Yes but reality always does things differently.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is this a trendy new phenomina?
- From: Dawlish
- Re: Is this a trendy new phenomina?
- References:
- Is this a trendy new phenomina?
- From: Lawrence Jenkins
- Re: Is this a trendy new phenomina?
- From: Dawlish
- Re: Is this a trendy new phenomina?
- From: Lawrence Jenkins
- Re: Is this a trendy new phenomina?
- From: Dawlish
- Re: Is this a trendy new phenomina?
- From: Lawrence Jenkins
- Re: Is this a trendy new phenomina?
- From: Dawlish
- Is this a trendy new phenomina?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is this a trendy new phenomina?
- Next by Date: Re: Is this a trendy new phenomina?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is this a trendy new phenomina?
- Next by thread: Re: Is this a trendy new phenomina?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
